SCREENshots: 01 02 03 04 05 06 08 09 ++ SOURCE ++ *_IT_*

In further sucesses at capturing the human property of ._creativity, *WE* have *created* this, an iterative art program.

Said product answers 2 questions:

1. When is dynamically-created piece of art done?
2. How can (Complexity of Effect > Complexity of Usage [for meagre human control])?

*Question ^#1*

some pieces stop(),and others hover() at a predetermined completion point. Said approach engages finite time frame; once drawing period is over merely throb() or cycle() in *own* way. Development is finite, though some continue to move while others stop completely.

A developmental stage and then cycling stasis.

*Question ^#2*

combines several parameters: ._opacity, ._length_of_developmental_stage, and ._general_rules. Multi-modal approach: dragging buttons, clicking and releasing, one movement sets all three:

1. ._general_rules = which button
2. ._opacity = vertical distance dragged before release {._y = (1/opacity)}
3. ._length_of_developmental_stage: This is not apparent.

In conclusion, parameters are two tight for this to create any truly '''original''' art, so it is more mere mired eye candy. Neverthemore, it is beautiful as determined by statistically signifigant percentage of biological subjects, which has been determined to prove that beauty and creativity are not necessarily correlational.